URL

W3C Working Group Note,

This version:
https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-url-1-20160926/
Latest published version:
https://www.w3.org/TR/url-1/
Editor's Draft:
https://url.spec.whatwg.org/
Previous Versions:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-url-1-20141209/
Feedback:
public-webapps@w3.org with subject line “[url] … message topic …” (archives)
Editors:
(Mozilla)
(IBM)
Obsoletion Notice

This specification is not being actively maintained, and should not be used as a guide for implementations. It may be revived in the future, but for now should be considered obsolete.

If you have questions or comments on this specification, please send an email to the editors.


Abstract

The URL Standard defines URLs, domains, IP addresses, the application/x-www-form-urlencoded format, and their API.

Status of this document

This document is no longer maintained. Please refer to the URL Living Standard for the latest version of this specification.

Conformance

Document conventions

Conformance requirements are expressed with a combination of descriptive assertions and RFC 2119 terminology. The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in the normative parts of this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. However, for readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase letters in this specification.

All of the text of this specification is normative except sections explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. [RFC2119]

Examples in this specification are introduced with the words “for example” or are set apart from the normative text with class="example", like this:

This is an example of an informative example.

Informative notes begin with the word “Note” and are set apart from the normative text with class="note", like this:

Note, this is an informative note.

Conformant Algorithms

Requirements phrased in the imperative as part of algorithms (such as "strip any leading space characters" or "return false and abort these steps") are to be interpreted with the meaning of the key word ("must", "should", "may", etc) used in introducing the algorithm.

Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps can be implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is equivalent. In particular, the algorithms defined in this specification are intended to be easy to understand and are not intended to be performant. Implementers are encouraged to optimize.

Index

Terms defined by this specification